Why Mito AI Platform DiffuseScan Team Contact Blog Insights Login
Oncology-First Decision Strategy Platform

Better scientific decisions across the oncology asset lifecycle.

Mito AI is the scientific decision layer for asset strategy — turning fast-moving clinical evidence and expert discourse into governed, decision-grade outputs for the teams steering oncology innovation and care.

The Problem

From data access to decision readiness

The bottleneck is no longer access to data. It is turning fragmented, noisy evidence into trusted, decision-ready outputs at speed.

01
Evidence explosion
Publications, congress abstracts, guidelines, labels, trials, field insights and expert sentiment move faster than teams can synthesise manually — and lack a unified ontology and shared lexicon.
02
Decision pressure
Asset strategy, BD, clinical development and field teams need defensible answers for HCPs, investors and regulators in days or hours, not weeks — often under confidentiality that rules out external consultant support.
03
Trust gap
Generic AI is fast, but life sciences decisions need standardised outputs, governed inputs, and models that operate under full clinical context, evidence hierarchy and expert control.
Time to insight
< 1 hr
From data drop to "so what"
Congress readout live. Synthesis with clinical context, competitive framing and asset implications — ready in under an hour.
Synthesis at scale
100's
Multi-modal sources. One query.
Trials, labels, guidelines, congress, expert discourse — simultaneously. No cognitive ceiling. No coverage gaps.
Raising the floor · Breaking the ceiling
Expert-grade. Every query. Every team.
Output quality is no longer a function of who you ask. Best practice codified and standardised — so every team works from the same decision-grade baseline.
Signal to noise
10,000+
Entities resolved. Noise filtered.
Precision at entity level is the enemy of hallucination. Models operate on a clean, ranked, auditable signal.
Compounding intelligence
2x
A learning system. Not a lookup.
Every analysis enriches a shared evidence layer that doesn't reset. Each new signal sharpens everything before it.
"
In oncology, the evidence base that determines every critical decision — how to design the trial, whether to do the deal, how to sequence the indication, how to engage researchers and KOLs — is growing faster than any team can synthesise manually.
From static reviews to dynamic asset strategy
The Platform

Real-time analyses for critical asset strategy decisions

Helyx maps clinical reality in real time and runs decision-grade analytics. DiffuseScan optimises the full option space. Together, they give development leaders the confidence to act.

HELYX
The scientific decision layer for asset strategy
Live
The Decision Workflows
Execute high-value outputs on demand — dynamic SoC outlooks, TPP reviews, indication prioritisation and comparative efficacy, and more…
Q-Bar
Evidence analysis with expert discourse — synthesise curated clinical data with de-noised, live KOL and investigator dialogue, and interrogate it on any question.
Unified Evidence Base
Literature, preprints, trial registries, congresses, labels, guidelines, real-time expert discourse and your own data — on one oncology data architecture.
A Visible Corpus
You see what is in the corpus, approve the sources a priori and, as the expert, can veto them. Every output is traceable back to source.
Request a Helyx pilot →
DiffuseScan
Mapping the decision frontier for drug design
In build
The optimum is not the maximum.

Custom generative models and deterministic biophysics map the full decision space for asset design — ruling out unviable configurations and finding the balance between efficacy and toxicity before capital is committed.

Today · ADCs Next · CAR-T Radioligands Bispecifics

The engine behind both

A unified oncology ontology, integrating inference-driven and deterministic reasoning with decades of domain logic. A fully visible corpus where every output is traceable to source.

Before Helyx
Manual. Fragmented. Non-compounding.
✕Manual synthesis — building a strategic baseline from literature, congress data and trial registries takes weeks of analyst hours.
✕Static strategy — diligence and TPPs are point-in-time exercises that decay as soon as a competitor reads out.
✕Fragmented execution — indication prioritisation run across disjointed spreadsheets and slow external advisory.
✕Ungoverned technology — horizontal AI tools without an oncology ontology, producing outputs clinical leaders cannot trust.
With Helyx
Governed. Grounded. Compounding.
✓Agile analytics — structured, source-cited SoC landscapes in hours, as an immediate first pass for expert review.
✓Real-time, cumulative outputs — knowledge compounds, keeping asset strategy calibrated against live shifts in the field.
✓Codified workflows — TPP stress tests and comparative efficacy scenarios run on demand.
✓Deterministic trust — every output anchored to a governed oncology data foundation, fully traceable.
Where We Fit

The next value unlock: a scientific decision layer

Systems of record manage workflows. BI shows metrics. Databases store facts. Mito AI delivers the scientific decision layer for asset strategy.

Mito AI
An oncology-specific asset strategy platform bringing depth and agility to development decisions.
External intelligence
Literature, trial registries, congresses, labels, guidelines and commercial intelligence sources
Data / BI layer
Data platforms, dashboards and internal analytics
Systems of record
Content, CRM, trial management, data capture and safety systems
The Mito Advantage

Why generic AI cannot solve this well

Six structural problems in oncology decision-making that general-purpose AI cannot address — and how Mito AI answers each one.

01
Biomedical ambiguity
Generic AIOne concept carries many names and acronyms across sources, with subjective interpretation on top.
Mito answer
Entity normalisation and disambiguation, bridging the formalised oncology evidence base with unstructured market intelligence.
02
Clinical context
Generic AIBlind to setting, line of therapy, patient population and prior exposure.
Mito answer
Resolved to the precise tumour indication setting, so insights map only to the population that matters.
03
Evidence analysis
Generic AIOften single-sourced, with a broken continuum between trial, label and practice guideline.
Mito answer
Multiplexed across trial design, clinical data, regulatory label and practice guideline — ranked and properly weighted.
04
Expert discourse
Generic AIStatic corpora and generic probes, blind to real-time shifts in KOL influence and frontline adoption.
Mito answer
Qualified voices only, continuous horizon scanning and custom probes — layered over the formalised evidence base.
05
Constraint trade-offs
Generic AILimited constraints, approximated statistically, with no hard biological or operational gates.
Mito answer
Molecular, clinical and operational gates enforced deterministically before anything is generated.
06
Enterprise trust
Generic AIOpaque corpus, invisible ranking, and citations bolted on after the fact.
Mito answer
A visible corpus and a priori source selection you can veto, with editable, auditable workflows.
Why Mito AI

Oncology precision built over years. Not replicable overnight.

The clinical inference architecture behind Mito AI rests on a proprietary knowledge mesh built for oncology — connecting entities, settings and evidence that general-purpose AI cannot resolve.

Mito AI Knowledge Mesh Network diagram connecting atomic entities through clinical inference to relevance algorithms. Atomic Entities Clinical Inference Relevance Layer Genes & biomarkers (1,500+ & growing) Tumour histology (500+) Tumour group (n=17) Mechanism of action Modality Line of therapy Treatment setting Asset & drug Trial design Endpoints Development stage Evidence ranking Population match Competitive context Unmet need signal Geography Hover any node to explore connections
Atomic entities Clinical inference Relevance algorithms

Atomic entity layer

Genes, biomarkers, MoAs, tumour settings, lines of therapy, trial phases, endpoints and drugs — normalised across every source so each analysis starts from a shared clinical lexicon.

Hybrid retrieval engine

Entity-based retrieval combined with semantic search and relevance ranking — the precision and recall that keyword search and general LLMs cannot match.

Clinical inference architecture

Proprietary relevance logic that evaluates evidence against the specific decision context — setting, population, line of therapy and biomarker.

Source-audited synthesis

Every claim traceable to its source — built for outputs that face R&D, regulatory, HCP or deal-committee scrutiny.

Our Philosophy

AI that augments expertise.
Not replaces it.

We build at the intersection of generative, agentic and deterministic reasoning — and we are deliberate about where each belongs. Models accelerate synthesis and orchestrate the work; deterministic rules and decades of domain logic hold them to clinical and biological reality.

We don't believe AI should replace scientific expertise in drug development. The complexity of oncology and the stakes of each decision demand a human who understands the science and owns the process as much as the outcome. With a fully visible corpus and every output traceable to source, the expert stays in control throughout.

That means striking the right balance between control and delegation at every layer of the platform. We'd love to share how we think about it.

Curious how we do it? Let's talk →
Generative AI
Accelerates synthesis
Turns fragmented, multi-source evidence into structured, cited, expert-ready outputs in hours — not weeks.
Agentic & deterministic reasoning
Orchestrates — within hard limits
Runs multi-step workflows across sources, with molecular, clinical and operational gates enforced before anything is generated.
Human expertise
Owns the decision
Go / no-go framing, risk tolerance and the strategic narrative. Always. Mito AI is designed to augment the expert — not replace them.
Getting Started

How we work together

Mutual discovery, early user feedback and a platform "tune-up" before roll-out — so Mito AI fits your workflows, not the other way round.

01
Mutual Discovery
Immersion session with target expert users to map your priority use cases, workflows and decision pain points.
02
Pilot & User Requirements
4–6 week hands-on pilot with defined success criteria, collaborative workshops and iterative user feedback.
03
Platform Tune-Up
Refine and configure based on pilot learnings — use case prioritisation, output formats and evidence coverage.
04
Roll Out
Expand to the wider team and additional tumour areas with confidence — encoded into a proven playbook.
4–6 weeks
pilot to get things started
5–15
initial expert user cohort
50–70%
analytical heavy lifting compressed
Next Step

The next step is a conversation.

We work closely with our biopharma partners — with the depth and serviced engagement to make Mito AI work for your workflows, your priority tumour areas and your team.

The Leadership Team

Biopharma strategy and tech transformation expertise

Mito AI combines biopharma domain expertise, product design, data engineering and a pragmatic understanding of how pharma teams make decisions.

DT
Dr. Debasish Talukdar
Founder & CEO
Physician by background, ex-Bain, former CEO in pharma services, and domain expert at the intersection of science, data and technology. Career focus on advising biopharma leadership on asset and portfolio journeys.
LinkedIn
MP
Marzi Jehangir Patell
Co-Founder & CTO
Product-tech leader and former digital transformation partner at Bain & Co, with experience designing and delivering user-centred technology solutions in complex enterprise environments.
LinkedIn
Get in Touch

Let's talk about your asset strategy

Request a Helyx pilot, sign up or partner on DiffuseScan, or simply ask how Mito AI fits your development decisions.

🏢
Registered Office
Mitochon Ltd · 9th Floor, 107 Cheapside
London, UK, EC2V 6DN
🔗